AffRepublic removing commissions via player bans, incorrect deductions and changing terms (around 3000 / 4000€ case)

[REflECTZje]

Hi everyone,

I would like to report a serious issue with AffRepublic regarding commission deductions, player bans, and inconsistent explanations.


I have been working with them for a few months and generated over 100 FTDs in one month alone. However, I started noticing a consistent pattern of deductions and withheld payments.


Throughout multiple months, players referred by me were flagged and banned during the month.


The issue is:

• these players deposited and played normally
• but later I was told they were “under review” or “suspicious” (The company withholds the players' earnings and keeps my commissions because the players were banned)
• as a result, I did not receive commissions from them
  
  I even tested it with some family members to see if it happened to anyone, and then I was sure that they were banning players for (double account) when it was a lie. Or because they didn't pass KYC, which was also a lie... With this scheme, they manage to retain winnings for themselves and not pay commissions.

This has happened repeatedly.

One critical case:

I was informed after the fact that I couldn't make deposits to stream because I was an affiliate, but here's what happened, which is even worse.

• I deposited: around 600€ (2x 300€)
• I withdrew: 1000€
• Actual profit: 400€

However, AffRepublic deducted 1000€ from my commissions instead of 400€.


This means they deducted the total withdrawal amount, not the profit.

And in my account i had a big win of 19k. so they got my 19k and my 600 euros deposit!


I believe this is clearly incorrect.


Over time, I received different reasons for deductions:

• “small withdrawals are suspicious”
• “players under internal review”
• “self-referral violation”
• “redeposit requirement not met”

These reasons change frequently and are not consistent.


For example, in March they didn't pay me for 12 players because they say that those same players made the minimum wager and withdraw, and that's why they don't pay... when I'm not responsible for how the players play... nor what they do... my agreement was: 20 euro baseline with 75 euro commission.

35% of the players would have to redeposit.

In addition to these 12 players, there are also the banned players... we're talking about a lot of money.

• Players excluded for making “small withdrawals”
• CPA not paid for players depositing under 20€ (not clearly enforced before)
• Lack of transparency about:
  • which players are duplicated
  • which are self-excluded
  • which are banned
    
    
    

  • Total impact​

    
    In total, I estimate around 4000€ in lost commissions over 3 months due to:
    
    
    • banned players
    • excluded players
    • incorrect deductions
      
      
      

    • Evidence​

      
      I have attached screenshots showing:
      
      
      • conversations with the manager
      • commission stats
      • deductions applied
      • examples of banned/flagged players
        
        
        

      • Request​

        
        I am requesting:
        
        
        • a full breakdown of all deductions
        • clarification on banned players
        • correction of the incorrect 1000€ deduction
        • payment of the rightful commissions
          
          

      • https://imgur.com/a/gODfZVu

        All the evidence is here at this link.
        

        ---

        
        Thank you.

 

[MissExposé]

Hello @REflECTZje,

Due to the nature of bespoke deals, especially CPA agreements where fraud concerns can be both common and subjective, and where KPIs can be difficult to clearly assess, our ability to mediate and determine who is right or wrong in this situation is extremely limited.

What we can do, and will do, is forward your complaint to their representatives for review. Please send us your affiliate account username via PM.

We would recommend, for future collaborations, starting with smaller prepayment deals to build trust and establish a stronger working relationship with the program. At the same time, it’s important to remain as transparent as possible with your traffic sources and methods.

 

[REflECTZje]

Hello @REflECTZje,

Due to the nature of bespoke deals, especially CPA agreements where fraud concerns can be both common and subjective, and where KPIs can be difficult to clearly assess, our ability to mediate and determine who is right or wrong in this situation is extremely limited.

What we can do, and will do, is forward your complaint to their representatives for review. Please send us your affiliate account username via PM.

We would recommend, for future collaborations, starting with smaller prepayment deals to build trust and establish a stronger working relationship with the program. At the same time, it’s important to remain as transparent as possible with your traffic sources and methods.

Thank you for the response.

I have sent my affiliate username via PM.

Just to clarify, my concern is not only about CPA conditions, but also about:

- incorrect deductions (e.g. full withdrawal deducted instead of profit)
- lack of transparency regarding banned players
- constantly changing explanations for deductions

I’m happy to provide any additional data if needed.