Fortune Affiliates Terms and Conditions Analysis

[Guard Dog]

Affiliate Payment Date?: Payments of commission for the previous month are made by the 20th day after the close of the month.

Negative Carryover?: Negative balances are carried forward and continue to carry forward month on month until any negative balances have been recovered.

Minimum Payment?: From FA FAQ Page:
Payment MethodMinimum Payment
Neteller 50.00
Payspark 50.00
Wire 1,000.00
Check 1,000.00


Revenue Share Percentage?: There are several available models for sharing revenue. The more classic style is:

New Active Accounts% of Casino Profit
0-1040%
11-2550%
26+60%


CPA Details?: There is no CPA model that can be found

Tiered Revenue Sharing?: From FA FAQ Page: you will receive 2% commission of whatever earnings they generate.

Our overall analysis: The terms at Fortune Affiliates are fairly typical and do not appear to be predatory. The only issue we have with the terms is the Negative Carryover. HOWEVER - FA has many different earnings models and gives you plenty of choice on how you can earn your commissions.

Fortune Affiliates Represents: Royal Vegas, Platinum Play, Vegas Palms, 7 Sultans, Vegas Towers, Desert Dollar, Fortune Room, Vegas Villa, and Pokertime (Microgaming Software)

Check out Fortune Affiliates Now: Fortune Affiliates - Casino Affiliate Program

 

[guljo]

I am confused here is says above:

Negative Carryover?: Negative balances are carried forward and continue to carry forward month on month until any negative balances have been recovered.

But on the right side there is a green NO to Have Negative Carryover?

So which one is correct?

 

[KasinoKing]

You just bumped a 7-year old thread!

I've been working with these guys since around that time (2006 or 2007) and I am not aware that they ever had NCO.
(Except for high-rollers who win more than $10,000 in 1 month)

KK

 

[guljo]

Thanks KK,

the thread was sticky so I thought it was edited with fresh content.

anyway I am having troubles to find affiliate programs reviews on this site. I just found dedicated forums like this one. Are there fresh reviews as well?

 

[Guard Dog]

I will have to re-review them, sorry for that. At one time they must have had NCO. I still consider High Roller carryover a form of NCO, but it still is not quite the same.

Sorry for the inconsistency.

 

[frankcolt]

I've had a player for Years who's won A LOT some months but lost wayyyyyyyyyyyyy more over the years - I got hit with the High Roller carryover - so I consider it the same and very irritating

 

[AussieDave]

I've had a player for Years who's won A LOT some months but lost wayyyyyyyyyyyyy more over the years - I got hit with the High Roller carryover - so I consider it the same and very irritating

In instances where a player has lost far more than they've won, this high roller clause should take a players win/loss into account.

Corralling high rollers, in this example, is 100% unfair toward affiliates.

I will have to re-review them

Did they end up getting re-reviewed?

 

[admin]

A reminder is sent to all affiliate managers.

 

[Guard Dog]

They have not. I am out of town this week, sorry. Will get to it.

 

[AussieDave]

Thanks GD