ItSystem
New Member
- Joined
- Jun 1, 2026
- Messages
- 3
- Reaction score
- 0
I am sharing my experience with Storm Affiliates, ToTheMoon Affiliates, CoolAffs, Betmen Affiliates, and Sparta Affiliates after more than €10,000 in affiliate commissions were rejected following fraud allegations.
I promoted these brands through Meta Ads campaigns and invested a substantial advertising budget to acquire players.
When concerns regarding traffic quality were raised, I provided extensive evidence, including Meta Ads data, campaign screenshots, ad spend records, and proof that the traffic was generated through legitimate advertising activity.
Despite providing all requested evidence, the commissions were still rejected.
What immediately caught my attention was that the fraud reports and explanations received from these different brands were almost identical.
The same arguments, the same conclusions, and the same approach were used across multiple programs.
Based on my experience, these affiliate programs appear to be closely connected.
There are also strong indications of links with Chilli Partners, and it seems that the same anti-fraud team
The main issue is not the fraud investigation itself.
The issue is that no concerns were raised while the campaigns were actively running and advertising costs were being incurred. The fraud accusations only appeared after all traffic had been delivered and commissions had accumulated.
The explanations provided also fail to take into account how Meta Ads acquisition works.
Similar player profiles across multiple brands are not unusual when campaigns target overlapping audiences and users pass through similar funnels and communication flows.
I am publishing this case so other affiliates can perform their own due diligence before investing significant advertising budgets into these brands.
I am ready to provide screenshots, campaign data, ad spend records, conversations, and fraud reports to support every statement made in this post.
I promoted these brands through Meta Ads campaigns and invested a substantial advertising budget to acquire players.
When concerns regarding traffic quality were raised, I provided extensive evidence, including Meta Ads data, campaign screenshots, ad spend records, and proof that the traffic was generated through legitimate advertising activity.
Despite providing all requested evidence, the commissions were still rejected.
What immediately caught my attention was that the fraud reports and explanations received from these different brands were almost identical.
The same arguments, the same conclusions, and the same approach were used across multiple programs.
Based on my experience, these affiliate programs appear to be closely connected.
There are also strong indications of links with Chilli Partners, and it seems that the same anti-fraud team
The main issue is not the fraud investigation itself.
The issue is that no concerns were raised while the campaigns were actively running and advertising costs were being incurred. The fraud accusations only appeared after all traffic had been delivered and commissions had accumulated.
The explanations provided also fail to take into account how Meta Ads acquisition works.
Similar player profiles across multiple brands are not unusual when campaigns target overlapping audiences and users pass through similar funnels and communication flows.
I am publishing this case so other affiliates can perform their own due diligence before investing significant advertising budgets into these brands.
I am ready to provide screenshots, campaign data, ad spend records, conversations, and fraud reports to support every statement made in this post.
