Affrepublic BIG scammers!!!

[stsopas]

It's honestly a disgrace that such garbage even dares to call themselves partners. We started working together in mid-April, and when I asked why I hadn't been paid yet for the 6 FTDs I had delivered — even though it was already May 7th and another 6 FTDs had been added — they replied that the traffic "seems fake" and that I won’t be paid at all.
I’m working with 12 other partners and I get paid every single month without any issues. No one has ever made such claims.
Stay away from these scammers — they simply won’t pay you. Ever!

 

[MissExposé]

Hello @stsopas please check your PM.

 

[AffrepublicManager]

Hello,
Would like to share our response to his comment
We have all the proofs that this is a fraudulent or motivated traffic
1) Conversion rate - reg to dep is 100%, what's impossible
2) All players have made only one deposit without RDC(return deposited customer)
3) Players made deposits under the same nickname on several brands

All of the above suggests that this is either fraudulent or motivated traffic. In our experience, such a conversion rate is not possible. For our part, we can provide all the proofs

 

[stsopas]

Hey,

Thanks for your “investigation,” it was honestly a thrilling read — like a Netflix crime doc but with more imagination.

Let’s break this masterpiece down:

1) Conversion rate reg-to-dep is 100%, what’s impossible
Right, because in your world people apparently register just for fun and then forget why they came. Newsflash: when traffic is highly targeted, and users come with intent (you know, the point of performance marketing), yes, conversion can be that high. Shocking, I know.
But really, 100% conversion is “impossible”? That would be a solid point… if we were talking about a statistically significant sample over a real period of time.
But let’s not kid ourselves — we’re talking about what? A handful of users over less than a month? That’s not analysis, that’s reading tea leaves. When you work with a tiny, ultra-targeted sample, especially in performance marketing, surprise surprise: the users who do sign up are already ready to deposit. That’s the entire point.
So no, 100% conversion in such a short timeframe isn’t suspicious — it’s what happens when the funnel actually works and you’re not drowning in junk traffic. If that's confusing, maybe re-read what performance marketing is supposed to achieve.

2) All players have made only one deposit without RDC (return deposited customer)
Right, because obviously, if someone doesn’t deposit 3 times in the first week, it’s definitely fraud. Let me help you out here — even in this extremely limited timeframe, there was already a user who re-deposited. I even informed your “affiliate manager” (or whoever was pretending to be one) about this.
But of course, that didn’t seem to matter. Why? Because by that point I had to remove your brands from my site, since — and here's the shocking part — you weren’t even paying the April commission. Yep, that small thing where you compensate for the traffic you already received.
And frankly, based on what I’ve seen from my traffic and the growth curve of my page, if your brands had stayed live and you had shown the slightest sense of professionalism, you’d already have more return depositors by now. But hey, if you prefer to shoot yourselves in the foot and then blame the traffic for limping, be my guest.

3) Players made deposits under the same nickname on several brands
Ah yes, the grand finale — “same nickname across brands”. Stop the presses! We’ve cracked the fraud case of the century: people use the same username online. Imagine that.
Now, let’s add a fun little twist to this detective story. Your so-called “affiliate manager” — you know, the one who ghosted payment discussions — was the one who insisted on placing four of your brands on the site. Not only that, he requested specific premium placements, because apparently exposure was important... until results actually came in.
And here’s another shocker for you: I already work with several companies that operate multiple brands. Guess what? Users often use the same nickname. It’s common. It’s normal. It’s expected. This is literally the first time I’ve ever seen someone try to twist that into “proof of fraud.” Desperate much?

So unless you’re planning to start a crusade against shared usernames across the internet, maybe rethink this particular theory — it’s not holding up.

All this really proves is that you’re trying very hard to find an excuse not to pay. And that’s fine — just don’t dress it up like a cyber-forensics drama. If you’ve made a decision, say it straight. But don’t insult our intelligence with amateur “fraud theories” because the results were better than you expected.

Ι’d love to see your so-called “proofs.” Really. Please do share. Until then, we’ll stick to facts over fantasy. Oh, and just so we’re clear — I even sent your “manager” screenshots of actual payments made to Meta for Facebook ads, just to show how this so-called “unnatural traffic” was, in reality, a product of actual spend and targeting. But hey, why let facts get in the way of a refund-free fairytale?

Cheers,

 

[AffrepublicManager]

By claiming a 100% conversion rate from reg to dep, he is confirming that his traffic is fraudulent. No webmaster can provide a 100% conversion rate - this is a well-known fact in our industry. We are sure that everyone who sees this post will understand our position.

 

[stsopas]

By claiming a 100% conversion rate from reg to dep, he is confirming that his traffic is fraudulent. No webmaster can provide a 100% conversion rate - this is a well-known fact in our industry. We are sure that everyone who sees this post will understand our position.

You say 100% rate BUT IT’S ONLY 6 FDTS FOR GOD’S SAKE!

 

[eenzoo]

Yeah, would you bring in 100 FTD with a 80% rate they would call you genius.

But 6? That makes it even more obvious.

I mean, calling some guys to dep some cash to fullfil quotas is the oldest cheat ever ... but on Revshare :-D

Do not expect someone is pay u a CPA for someting like that

 

[stsopas]

Yeah, would you bring in 100 FTD with a 80% rate they would call you genius.

But 6? That makes it even more obvious.

I mean, calling some guys to dep some cash to fullfil quotas is the oldest cheat ever ... but on Revshare :-D

Do not expect someone is pay u a CPA for someting like that

I’m not sure I fully understand what you mean, but I’d like to clarify that this partnership was new and lasted less than a month because they refused to pay me for the first 6 FTDs I generated in April.

I don’t see what’s suspicious about launching a new brand and getting a few FTDs in the first 10–15 days.

This happens all the time on my site with new brands, and I’ve never had any issues with any other affiliate program.

And if those initial FTDs were supposedly “suspicious,” then why was the partnership ended by me and not by them?

Let me tell you why:
Because sign-ups and ftds continued into May, one player even made a redeposit, and by the time I removed their casinos from the list, their brands had received a total of €405 from FTDs and €40 from a redeposit — all from my traffic.

In a hybrid deal with a €20 baseline, the players who came from my site ended up depositing significantly more than that.

This is just SO obvious. They just wanted NOT to pay!