[SCAM ALERT 22939€ ] AFFREPUBLIK

[trust1Networking]

Our story is started at 2th of September Denny from aff republic was contacted with us for a streamer traffic.
We introduced our self and told him is our e-mail traffic is better quality in HU geo, then we agreed on 250€ CPA and 40% Rev Share with 60% dep to cost KPI.
We got 3 Brands:
- NEED FOR SPIN
- Rolling Slots
- Wild Tokyo

We started delivering the first traffic at 12th of Sept.
After this Denny was kinda disappeared. Answers was really slow it took 3-4 days, but never mentioined any problem.
End of the month he mentioned the quallity is lower than the KPI so please push the traffic, what we did how he requested it.
Since 22th of september until 5th of October haven't got any replyies.

He was back from SBC at 5th of Oct. and mentioned: Their team says we have same players depositing for the 3 brands. WE NEVER AGREED on we can't deliver the same traffic for the 3 Brand but he was continously saying they can't pay for the same traffic for different brand what we weren't relly accepted and weren't understand why is that problem when on the stats clearly see they making re-deposits and plays natural on every brand!
BUT a day after we just got a meassage they not even pay for a single FTD couse my Traffic is fraud. I requested a Fully Detailed report what they don't provide just trying to make excuse to don't pay the reward!
This happened today when i requested evidence they didn't provide anything and even Deleted my affiliate profile!

USER ID shown on the pictures

TOTAL AMOUNT IS: € 22939

If anyone have the same expirince or can help pls contact with us below!
THANKS

https://imgur.com/a/WkhifMj

 

[xTitanpwnz]

Thank you for reminding me!

I’m planning to start working as an affiliate in the near future. I recently registered on the website, but I’ve only found negative reviews about it. They also contacted me directly, but based on what I’ve read, I definitely won’t be signing a contract with them.

 

[JTK]

AffRepublic

AffRepublic Forum

www.affiliateguarddog.com

There have been some complaints about this program. They seem responsive, so I'm sure they'll address it.

 

[MissExposé]

Hello @trust1Networking please share your affiliate account username via private message.
Also, please keep in mind that AGD does not mediate in CPA, hybrid and similar disputes, only RevShare. But we will certainly inform AffRepublic representatives about your complaint.

 

[Denny]

Hello Team.
There are several important points that were not fully addressed in this story, and we would like to clarify them before providing a detailed response regarding the traffic.

Communication and traffic stop​

Nobody disappeared or stopped communicating. We have clear evidence of this in the correspondence, including the dates and timestamps. In most cases, our responses were provided on the same day or the following day. The only longer gaps of 2–3 days occurred around the conference and weekends.

After the last question from trust1Networking regarding traffic quality, we explained the situation regarding the players' average deposit amount. Following that, we asked for the traffic to be stopped and said that we would monitor how the existing players continued to perform.

Therefore, we stopped accepting the traffic on September 22.

However, trust1Networking did not stop the traffic and continued sending it for another four days, which resulted in 13 additional players being acquired after we had explicitly requested the traffic to be stopped.

We have clear evidence of this in the correspondence. On September 22, we sent a message requesting that the traffic be stopped, and the account operated under the name Imvitko reacted to that message on the same day, which clearly indicates that the message had been seen.

Only on September 26 did he respond, stating that he had missed the message and would stop the traffic.

Therefore, the traffic continued for four additional days after the stop request. We believe this is an important fact that should be taken into consideration when reviewing the complaint. We have screenshots confirming this and can provide them if required.

Communication between September 22 and October 5​

The second point we would like to clarify is the statement that there was no communication between September 22 and October 5.

This is not accurate.

• September 22: We requested that the traffic be stopped.
• September 26: trust1Networking responded to the request.
• September 28: trust1Networking contacted us again.
• September 30: We replied that we were attending a conference, as we had been travelling since September 28.
• October 1: trust1Networking sent another message while we were still at the conference.
• October 5: We replied to that message.

The October 1 message was regarding payment, not the continuation of traffic. The traffic had already been stopped.

Our standard payments are processed promptly, normally by the 5th of the month. However, when there are unresolved traffic-quality issues, as was the case here, final payments may be processed up to the 15th of the month. This is also stated in our company terms.

Therefore, the statement that there was no communication between September 22 and October 5 does not reflect the actual correspondence. We have retained all screenshots and can provide them to the moderators if necessary.

Traffic quality and reason for withholding payment​

We would now like to explain the actual reason why the traffic was rejected and why the payment was not approved.

trust1Networking agreed to our company terms when registering as a partner. All partners are provided with our terms and are given the opportunity to review them before starting cooperation.

Our terms clearly state that incentivized/motivated traffic is not accepted, and that attempts to manipulate player activity or the tracking system will be investigated and may result in the traffic being rejected and unpaid. The terms also contain additional criteria regarding traffic quality.

During our investigation, we identified patterns indicating that the traffic was either manipulated or generated through duplicate/fake accounts.

In particular, we identified a significant number of registrations where the same players created accounts across different brands, apparently with the purpose of generating multiple payouts for the same player.

We have never seen such a high proportion of repeated players from an email-marketing source with any of our other partners.

In this case:

• approximately 74% of the players were identified as duplicates/repeated players;
• approximately 50% made their deposits using cryptocurrency;
• the conversion pattern is highly unusual for the claimed email-marketing source: 479 visits → 218 registrations → 93 FTDs;
• players were creating accounts across all four brands within intervals of only a few minutes.

We previously provided trust1Networking with screenshots showing the registration and deposit timestamps, but these screenshots were not included in the complaint.

For example, one player made deposits at:

• 2026-09-17 12:14:46
• 2026-09-17 12:16:47
• 2026-09-17 12:18:11

across different brands.

There are a significant number of similar cases.

In addition, in cases where deposits were made by card, we identified instances involving apparently false or inconsistent personal information.

Due to the nature of the patterns we identified, we do not disclose detailed internal fraud-detection patterns publicly. Sharing this information in detail could allow fraudulent actors to adapt their behaviour and bypass our detection systems in the future, both with us and potentially with other brands.

For this reason, we provided screenshots showing the relevant deposit and registration patterns and explained why we considered the traffic to be incentivized, manipulated, or fraudulent.

If required, we are fully prepared to provide the complete evidence directly to the moderators for confidential review.

Additional concern regarding the xTitanpwnz account​

We would also like to bring the following point to the moderators' attention.

There is a comment below from xTitanpwnz, and we have concerns that this account may be connected to trust1Networking.

Both accounts appear to have been created yesterday, with only a short period between their creation times — approximately 3:19 PM and 3:35 PM — followed almost immediately by activity and a response to this complaint.

We cannot state this as a confirmed fact without further verification, but the timing raises a reasonable concern about whether the accounts may be connected.

If this is not the case, we would appreciate clarification from xTitanpwnz regarding which company they represent. According to their comment, they claim that we contacted them directly. We would be happy to verify whether there was actually any communication with that company.

In our view, drawing conclusions about our traffic quality immediately after creating an account and without having access to the underlying evidence raises additional concerns about the reliability of that comment.

Evidence​

We have retained all relevant correspondence, screenshots, registration and deposit timestamps, and other supporting evidence.

We are happy to provide the complete evidence to the moderators for independent review, including the screenshots previously sent to trust1Networking.

Our position is based on the actual traffic patterns and the evidence collected during our investigation, rather than simply on the volume or performance of the traffic. We believe the evidence clearly explains why the traffic was rejected and why the related payouts could not be approved under our traffic-quality terms.

https://imgur.com/a/YEWfHCJ

 

[Gatto]

@Denny thank you for your detailed and clear response.

 

[trust1Networking]

First of all you took my access to my all evidence after an hour so i can't even show but after you requested a traffic stop i missed that message what i was communicating for you! but when we saw that message's we haven't delivered any traffic and the duplicates what you mentioned is not for players in a brand its just a same email base for 3 brands we never agreed on we can not deliver the same traffic for the same brands.

Now you triying to get me suspicious with another account but we don't know him!

Crypto payments. I explained to you that this traffic source comes from crypto casino players, and that’s because of the credit score got destroyed if someone plays in hungary with bankcard


MOTIVATED TRAFFIC REACTION

I also can't understand how can be a motivated traffiic with 93 ftd with 50%+ redepo rate and 60% cost do dep and im really sure players are still active and thats why you try to take my traffic to get a RS from them in long time period

KPI was meet and we never break the terms as well

we sent the e-mail in the same time after that we can not have any controll of them how they act or what are they doing

i was requesting a fully detailed report than i got 3small screen shot what i can't double check couse you locked my account

PS.: we never had 4 brands we agreed and was working just 3 brands
on your answer i feel the same as our private messages trying to make excuses do not pay us even the revshare

im really courius you got your wage from the casino or not for sure with attached the proof

 

[trust1Networking]

You forgot to tell i tried to schedule a call with you as well to clarify everything but you never reflected for the request! but everything else

im really happy to share all my messages with the moderators to show the truth