Moved to Predatory

[Guard Dog]

Due to these terms:

Minimum Activity Rule
6.9 The Company reserves the right to set limits for a minimum level of activity on Affiliates accounts. Such minimum activity levels will be continuously reviewed and the Company reserves the right to terminate any agreement not reaching the limit. Such limit shall not be unreasonably high and basically reflect the intention of avoiding accounts where the revenue does not cover the Companys internal costs for maintaining the account and the payout procedure.

 

[riih]

That's insane! Normally they at least tell you what the minimum activity is. Good luck arguing your case for "unreasonably high" against them in court, if they just randomly feel like cutting your revshare deal.

 

[Engineer]

Exactly. Unfortunately, we see this clause often. Some programs agree to remove it, while others insist on keeping it -- and those programs get listed in the "predatory" section here.

 

[Zuga]

this rule is shady and ambiguous as hell

 

[BetOnlineUK]

Used to be a case the terms were straight forward and no misinterpretation could be made. But unfortunately the norm seems to be make the terms as ambigious as possible. Strangely enough it always favours the affiliate company.

Sorry Zuga did not mean to use your terminology