I want to share my recent experience with Huffson Group regarding NV Casino and YEP Casino, because unfortunately this cooperation turned into a very unpleasant payment dispute and I personally cannot recommend working with them after the way this situation was handled.
In March 2026, we agreed on a hybrid deal of $180 + 40% for placements on my websites. The agreement was confirmed in writing by their managers, the placements went live normally, and traffic was delivered as agreed.
After generating 2 FTDs during April, I contacted them regarding payment. Initially, everything seemed normal. They confirmed the payment request, asked for my USDT wallet details, confirmed the network, and informed me that no invoice was needed.
Shortly afterward, the situation started changing constantly.
First, I was told that they needed 10-15 FTDs for “traffic quality verification”, despite the fact that no such requirement had ever been mentioned before the cooperation started.
At the same period, I informed them that due to recent legal and regulatory developments in Greece, I had to temporarily remove all non-GR licensed casino brands from my websites as a precautionary measure. Because of that, I explained that I could no longer continue sending traffic, while still expecting payment for the traffic that had already been delivered properly.
After several discussions, they later informed me that the advertiser had agreed to pay for my traffic and that the payment was being processed. They even asked me once again to reconfirm my crypto wallet details.
However, after more delays, they suddenly changed their position again and attempted to reduce the payment to only $70 per deposit, which is roughly one third of the agreed amount.
Naturally, I refused to accept this. A deal cannot suddenly change after the traffic has already been delivered and after payment approval has already been confirmed.
Only after I rejected this reduced payment did they suddenly start claiming that the traffic was “fake/manipulated”.
This is exactly what makes the whole situation extremely concerning to me. If the traffic was genuinely fraudulent, there would be no reason to negotiate partial payments, ask for wallet confirmations, or confirm that payment processing had already started. Companies do not bargain over fraud traffic. They simply reject it and provide evidence.
Instead, throughout the conversations, the explanation kept changing from “verification”, to “more FTDs needed”, to “payment approved”, to “reduced payment”, and finally to “fake traffic” only after I refused the reduced offer.
At no point was any actual evidence of fraud ever provided to me.
I also want to make clear that I made every effort to resolve this professionally and privately before posting publicly. Unfortunately, there was no real willingness from their side to settle the matter fairly.
For transparency, the full chat history with their managers has already been provided to the AGD admins for review.
Based on this experience, I don't recommend working with Huffson Group.
In March 2026, we agreed on a hybrid deal of $180 + 40% for placements on my websites. The agreement was confirmed in writing by their managers, the placements went live normally, and traffic was delivered as agreed.
After generating 2 FTDs during April, I contacted them regarding payment. Initially, everything seemed normal. They confirmed the payment request, asked for my USDT wallet details, confirmed the network, and informed me that no invoice was needed.
Shortly afterward, the situation started changing constantly.
First, I was told that they needed 10-15 FTDs for “traffic quality verification”, despite the fact that no such requirement had ever been mentioned before the cooperation started.
At the same period, I informed them that due to recent legal and regulatory developments in Greece, I had to temporarily remove all non-GR licensed casino brands from my websites as a precautionary measure. Because of that, I explained that I could no longer continue sending traffic, while still expecting payment for the traffic that had already been delivered properly.
After several discussions, they later informed me that the advertiser had agreed to pay for my traffic and that the payment was being processed. They even asked me once again to reconfirm my crypto wallet details.
However, after more delays, they suddenly changed their position again and attempted to reduce the payment to only $70 per deposit, which is roughly one third of the agreed amount.
Naturally, I refused to accept this. A deal cannot suddenly change after the traffic has already been delivered and after payment approval has already been confirmed.
Only after I rejected this reduced payment did they suddenly start claiming that the traffic was “fake/manipulated”.
This is exactly what makes the whole situation extremely concerning to me. If the traffic was genuinely fraudulent, there would be no reason to negotiate partial payments, ask for wallet confirmations, or confirm that payment processing had already started. Companies do not bargain over fraud traffic. They simply reject it and provide evidence.
Instead, throughout the conversations, the explanation kept changing from “verification”, to “more FTDs needed”, to “payment approved”, to “reduced payment”, and finally to “fake traffic” only after I refused the reduced offer.
At no point was any actual evidence of fraud ever provided to me.
I also want to make clear that I made every effort to resolve this professionally and privately before posting publicly. Unfortunately, there was no real willingness from their side to settle the matter fairly.
For transparency, the full chat history with their managers has already been provided to the AGD admins for review.
Based on this experience, I don't recommend working with Huffson Group.