An interesting thing I have noticed about uffiliates and their tiered commission scheme. We don't actively promote them but still have players on there from a long time ago. I assume it applies to pretty much any other program that has the same sort of "commission hostage" clause..
For casino the rates depend on new players referred in a month:
0 new players - 20%
1-5 new players - 30%
etc
Plus they have negative carryover.
Not only does it suck, but they have also engineered a disincentive to refer new players in certain cases.
e.g. you have a big winner one month and no new players so far. On a $10,000 win, your commission sits at -$2000 @ 20%.
If you referred a new player who deposited anything in the same month, even just $30, your commission would then be -$3000 @ 30%. And they have negative carryover! So why would you want to send players until the next month once you see you have a big winner (if at all)? Stupid stupid stupid.
For casino the rates depend on new players referred in a month:
0 new players - 20%
1-5 new players - 30%
etc
Plus they have negative carryover.
Not only does it suck, but they have also engineered a disincentive to refer new players in certain cases.
e.g. you have a big winner one month and no new players so far. On a $10,000 win, your commission sits at -$2000 @ 20%.
If you referred a new player who deposited anything in the same month, even just $30, your commission would then be -$3000 @ 30%. And they have negative carryover! So why would you want to send players until the next month once you see you have a big winner (if at all)? Stupid stupid stupid.
