Casinoisy Partners Audit Report

[Guard Dog]

Hello AGD community,

Today we present to you the real revenue share audit report for Casinoisy Partners.

They have Casinoisy Casino as their brand.

Affiliate Reporting Platform: Post AffiliatePro

Casinoisy Partners

partners.casinoisy.com

Test signup and deposit is made from Country ‘Serbia’

We deposited €20 via MuchBetter and took a welcome bonus of 100% up to 500.

Our funds with the welcome offer were €40 and we started playing some slots:

Eventually, we lost all the funds and checked the earnings report:

Our earnings for the deposit of €20 via MuchBetter were €5
NGR for the 50% deal is €10

To summarize, the Effective Net Gaming Revenue (the amount of money deposited and lost) is 10/20= 50%.

Finally, multiply the advertised revenue share rate with the Effective NGR to see your real revenue share rate, e.g:

• 25% = 12.50 %
• 30% = 15.00 %
• 35% = 17.50 %
• 40% = 20.00 %
• 45% = 22.50 %

 

[Kadabra]

Nice

 

[gm2891]

It always makes me wonder what business plan these types of casinos have, how they plan to attract players, and how they plan to keep them coming back? Or they're just kind of "disposable" casinos? Like a pair of £5 shoes that look good but after a couple of times of wearing their soles falls off.

 

[Kadabra]

cheap whitelabels, my guess built in order to convert their own traffic + revshare basis + some natural organic traffic. "whatever we earn is good" kinda attitude

 

[CL-Ed]

The biggest question for me is whether it is Casino-Isy or Casi-Noisy?

I don't think it works either way

 

[AussieDave]

It always makes me wonder what business plan these types of casinos have, how they plan to attract players, and how they plan to keep them coming back? Or they're just kind of "disposable" casinos? Like a pair of £5 shoes that look good but after a couple of times of wearing their soles falls off.

As hilarious as that is, it is also a very good, and more importantly, true analogy of these 'poor man' white label casinos. Having received (spam) communications from these type of programs (loose reference), it's clear their AM's are clueless goofs, most probably just starting out. The entire business models seem geared towards hoodwinking affiliates by promising X and then doing a bait and switch with commission figures.

Frankly these crooks are morally/ethically bankrupt to steal from people sending them traffic. They don't last long. It's their MO to steal. Most seems to wash, rinse, repeat.

While I understand the attraction to promoting new casinos, my advice, don't touch them with a barge pole. Least not until they've proven themselves as 1... not to scam you/shave etc., etc... and 2... not scam players.

I always treat every new-white label as a possible clip-joint. I give then 18months to 2 years. If by then they have a clean record, then I might consider promoting them.

 

[gm2891]

As hilarious as that is, it is also a very good, and more importantly, true analogy of these 'poor man' white label casinos. Having received (spam) communications from these type of programs (loose reference), it's clear their AM's are clueless goofs, most probably just starting out. The entire business models seem geared towards hoodwinking affiliates by promising X and then doing a bait and switch with commission figures.

Frankly these crooks are morally/ethically bankrupt to steal from people sending them traffic. They don't last long. It's their MO to steal. Most seems to wash, rinse, repeat.

That's very true and looks like there are some others out there with the same thoughts. According to one website (translation): The low cost of creating a casino on this platform, which is why non-professionals come to the market, which later becomes a scam.

 

[AussieDave]

The low cost of creating a casino on this platform, which is why non-professionals come to the market, which later becomes a scam.

Back before we had this massive influx of white labels, a potential casino operator had to have some BIG bucks behind them. Generally, those with that sort of bankroll, ensure they employ people with, not only suitable skill-sets, but also those with hands on experience.

You wouldn't put a child in charge of buzz-saw.

However, right there...that's how things have broken down. We're dealing with a lot unfunded operators, who are employing mostly, inexperienced children, to control heavy-machinery!