objective ranking with bad reviews or only promoted bookmakers on the site

[danieldan]

have a problem with my site (still disabled), regarding the layout I've worked on.
So my site was supposed to be about Bukamcherski and was supposed to be bookmaker ranking, good and very negative review. A total of about 40 bookmakers, with around 300 words of review, which gave a huge number of over 9000 words on the whole page, which makes drama mobile, I tried to hide the text under accordion, but it also doesn't work. I also thought about creating a separate subpage for each bookmaker, one such review is too short. Long are only for a few bookmakers.
I also thought about eliminating all negative reviews, which would significantly limit the number of bookmakers on the site only to those it promotes but rather plans to promote, that is about 7. However, then the site will not be an objective ranking because it will not be bad or medium bookmakers.
Maybe anyone has any suggestion?

 

[Frank]

300 words is just snippets nowadays.. can you really review a casino with 300 words?

 

[danieldan]

300 words on the home page of the introduction and then the transition to the entire review. However, 60% of bookmakers are a negative review that they don't promote. The question is whether it is worth wasting time on them so that the site is a full overview or just focus on 10-15 which are promoted?

 

[Slawete]

Why not have an excerpt for each of bookies. A normal excerpt shouldn't exceed 100 words. Put the excerps of your best bookies on your homepage. Create another page with a full list of bookies, where are displayed only the titles(bookies names) and some details for each one.