Hi Folks. If you want to discover all the facts surrounding this matter, you can read this thread.
gamblingindustryassociation.com/forums/showthread.php?t=2584&page=10
Warning it is long and it took us weeks and weeks to get Embalu paid.
It was in fact one of best collaborations between...
Just to clarify, and in an attempt to be fair and balanced with the programs too, as I mentioned,.....I think 25k is enough to constitute a big winner, and is a fair number on the program's part.
The others are doing 10k or less, which is a joke, IMO.
That said, based on the 25k figure, if...
I think this almost OK, don't you?
The 25k is pretty fair to both, IMO.
They are fencing in the month is occured. Also fair to both, IMO.
If they could see their way clear to forgive the first 25k, then it would be completely good, IMO.
IE: If the player won 50, return him after he...
I have to agree, Joe.
Although I can't personally say I've had any good months with them lately, there were a few in the past 10 years that were OK.:D
Pure and simple though,...when they changed their terms a couple of years back,they allowed afffiliates the opportunity to stay on their...
J.Todd, IE: The APCW said:
Unbelievable. You are kidding us, right?
While I have disagreed with you occassionally, I always thought you were a true advocate for the affiliates.:o
How in the world could you condone retroactive changes in affiliate terms.
As a leader in our industry...
HMM. I'm just an old, dumb Ozark Mountain Hillbilly, so I have a hard time "Trusting" anyone that would change my financial agreement after the results are produced. Especially if it's on a straight commission, lifetime basis.
Retroactive changes open Pandora's Box.
What will come next...
Absolutely correct.
I would only add that 10k seems a bit low IMO to be considered a high roller.
In fact, High Roller probably isn't even the right term.
High Winner is probably more accurate.
A player that deposits a couple of hundred and hits a Jackpot isn't really a High Roller, IMO...