The point of a CPA model is to reward affiliates once off for a player. A player is not someone who deposits the minimum amount so the affiliate can be paid the once off commission fee, then goes to another doing the exact same thing, then after they have exhausted the resources move onto another group and never play at the casino again. We are a casino group, not a charity.
The above is not an affiliate partnership and we do not wish to work with any affiliates who display this type of behaviour.
Despite what you may think, we actually don't make any money from a $100 deposit after paying you $50 plus any bonuses given to the player. We pay royalties to MGS as well as other operating costs like salaries, bills, etc.
The problem with conducting your affiliate business in this way is that you are purposely trying to defraud the affiliate program. Why would we want a business partner who is out to stiff us? Doesn't sound like a partner in any sense of the word to me.
We have almost 80,000 registered affiliate accounts. All of the other 79,999 affiliates are able to advertise our casinos to people they don't know and get players, so what makes you different? I think you don't give the players enough credit. They are not stupid and if they are comfortable with what you are offering and can find a reason to trust your site, they will play at one of the casinos you recommend. The trick is to make sure you do proper reviews and give them the information they are looking for.
If you put in the hard work, you could be just like everyone else. If you purposely try to scam the program/group, you will find that any dream of being rich quick will be down the toilet very quickly.
I didn't say that you could not ask about how you can refer players. I said this linked with the rest of the evidence presented proves CPA Fraud and unethical behaviour.
I have an email here from you. Here is a direct quote:
So i have my ways of promoting , and i promote giving a share to my self , the player , and the casino .
If that is not paying the player then I have no idea what you are trying to say from this line.
To me that line sounds like you mean you are paying the player to do this, you are taking some money for yourself (the commission) and the money deposited in the casino is for the casino. How else can you take this line?
Either way, Yaniv has made the decision based on all of the points above and unfortunately as the T&C states, we do reserve the right to do this. As Yaniv told you already, this is not negotiable.
I'm sorry that you feel you have been hard done by, however we will not tolerate this type of behaviour from our affiliate partners.
Unless there is any further
new evidence to put forward here, I am done with this thread. I don't have any more time for this.
Cheers