BetVoyager Affiliates

Guard Dog

Guard Dog
Staff member
Joined
Dec 13, 2006
Messages
11,215
Reaction score
3,143
Today we present you a different type of the audit report, that we conducted for BetVoyager Affiliates.
They have one casino brand – BetVoyager Casino.

In their affiliate website in the Commission part, it is said that:
“BetVoyager has two types of games: standard, which have a traditional casino house edge and equal odds games, which have no house edge during gameplay. A partner commission is calculated differently for every game.
Receive 1% from every bet in Standard (Non-Equal Odds) games, equivalent to about 27% Revenue Share;
Receive 25% Revenue Share from the Equal Odds games.”


Basically, these guys offer a 1% wager share. This plan works well if players keep playing winning or losing, but if they lose quickly then it’s horrible, as shown in our single test audit (campaign name: AGD).

For the deposit of € 25, we earned only € 1.39, which is 1% of the Traditional Games Bets. Due to the fact that our single test might not be a good real-world example, in this report, we will include our real earnings, as well.

Traditional Games

image.png


Equal Odds Games

image (1).png


As a total over the life of our account, the system says we have earned a total of € 7334, but we have only collected € 3137!

image (2).png


And also looking at the 2 totals above for the different game types it says that we have been paid € 2317+ €832 = €3149, which is very close to what our financial department reported.

We look at have had about a 14% earnings from deposits (€ 3137 / € 22336), which is bad.

We have had 48 real players in total over the life of the account, which gives us about a € 65 earnings per player, which is also bad (€ 3137 / 48).

image (3).png


All in all, if you are working with this brand, keep an eye on your commission.
You might be surprised, but probably not in a good way...
 

Attachments

  • image.png
    image.png
    226.7 KB · Views: 298
  • image (1).png
    image (1).png
    108.1 KB · Views: 299
  • image (2).png
    image (2).png
    136.1 KB · Views: 276
  • image (3).png
    image (3).png
    245.8 KB · Views: 298
Top