The list has been updated againSorry guys. The first post is the best place to look and make your decision (IMO).
BetUS Casino is NOT a white label!!! Wow. I did not know this. As such, they will not pass on progressives nor will they pass on processor issues. BetUS has their own processors and doesn't use Rivals banning system either.
SlotsOfFortune will not pass on progressives and will update us next week on the processor issue.
iGaming.Pro is updated showing that they will also not pass on progressives.
The bottom of that list on post 1 is the list of Rivals I would NOT promote. They have made no statement whatsoever.
bonustreak (03-13-2010),triple777s (03-23-2010)
Hi there gambling guru,
On the subject of commission payments this month - one of the processors that has shut down (without seizing funds as it was only used for outgoing payments) is the ACH method. ACH is no longer available for players or affiliates.
All affected players and affiliates were notified, we just allowed a little extra time for alternative methods to be selected, hence the extra delay.
Commissions should be paid by Monday.
Regarding the other issues you mention, could you please include a quick summary here and I'll do my best to address your concerns - I've checked back on the other forum and it's grown into a much bigger discussion, quite confusing. :-/
Thanks,
Charlie
TheGamblingGuru (03-13-2010)
I made a similar post on GPWA and I will make the same post in response to the above quote.
The thing is though, processor confiscations are NOT chargebacks. You are refusing to pay commissions on legitimate players who made legitimate deposits.
Several Rival groups have stepped up to the plate and have agreed to pay commissions on any "lost deposits" due to processor confiscations. It's those groups who are willing to stand behind their processing that should continue to get our traffic.
Why would anyone want to continue to send traffic to a group that won't pay commissions on legitimate players when there are several groups who are prepared to do so?
Rhondagrace (03-14-2010)
NDA, it's my point of view. I work on USA market so i take some risks, if affiliates don't want take some risks with affiliates programs i think the best thing for these affiliates is to give up gambling and try to sell something else on internet. Gambling is risky on internet : i decided to work properly with affiliates, i cannot pay commissions on money that i haven't earned.
Trying to obtain money from affiliates program, knowing perfectly that we lost money exactly as affiliates, is not the good way to save our business : it's the best way to see shaving, casinos closed, dark methods, etc. Stop to dream : casinos doesn't find money on the floor, we're exactly like affiliates : we have to work hard.
Last edited by Igaming.pro; 03-13-2010 at 10:45 AM.
With all do respect, I think you are missing my point.
Several Rival groups have agreed to pay affiliates for any "lost deposits" due to processor confiscations. Therefore, it's in every affiliate's best interest to promote the brands who are willing to do this. The brands that are not willing to do this (whether it be because they are not financially stable and are "looking for money on the floor" or for other reasons) are the ones who stand to lose significant business.
Affiliates do not need to give up. Because of the Rival brands that have stepped up to the plate, we now have choices. We can choose to promote the brands that will pay us commissions for the legitimate players that we send them or we can promote the programs who refuse to do so. I can't speak for everyone, but I am sticking with the programs that are going to pay me for the players that I send them.
This is the statement, that we sent out yesterday. We will definitely inform you next week on the Master Card issue.
March 12, 2010: Statement on Progressives Contribution
Dear Partners,
We would like to inform you about our stand on the Progressive Jackpots contribution.
The introduction of the progressive slots in 2009 has not been handled with clarity, and the lack of communication provoked unfair affiliate commission calculations. Therefore, we took the decision that our affiliates will not be held responsible for any progressive jackpot contributions. All the contributions will be covered by the operator, and therefore you may feel secure, when promoting our progressive slots. Banners with the progressive stickers are available in the backend for marketing purposes. All deductions, corresponding to the progressives’ contributions will be refunded back to the affiliates.
Your business is very valuable to us, and we appreciate your continuous efforts at promoting our brand. We are about to take our final decision on the Master Card processors loss, and you’ll be updated shortly. You can be rest assured that we are taking into the consideration the interests of both the parties and our commitment towards the affiliates and the business demands.
Please feel free to contact us for any additional information, or clarification.
Best regards,
Natalie Stewart.
Affiliate Manager
Slots of Fortune • $777 Free Bonus • Enjoy Slots!
MSN Messenger: Natalie (at) sofaffiliates.com
SlotsOfFortune-Affiliates (03-13-2010)
With all due respect.... Maybe they should just avoid YOUR program.Originally Posted by Igaming.pro
I don't know about anybody else, but I am in this business to make money, not to gamble. If I wanted to Gamble I would put my money on the green felt. I do my work and I expect to get paid for it... end of story.
As an affiliate, I do MY job, fulfill my end of the contract, why the hell do programs like yours have such a hard time doing their job and living up to your end of the contract(don't bother answering, that was a rhetorical question combined with a rant.)
Last edited by lots0; 03-13-2010 at 07:35 PM.
triple777s (03-23-2010)
NDN & Lots0 : the proof is in front of you but you don't care, you prefer to force your partners to tell you what you want to hear, in despite of the reality: this business is very special at the moment, we're in a bad phase due to legal enforcement, few softwares still continue to work in US, most of europeans casinos have been blocked and had to change their URL... So YES : it's risky, for you, for me, for everybody. You cannot continue to ignore it and only think "i'm not a gambler, i'm only in gambling because i want earn money", sorry, with all due respect, this reasoning is too simplistic. It goes directly against our common interest : affiliates and casinos have to be a team, not enemies. Casino earn money, you earn money with us. Casino don't earn money: you cannot earn money. Whether you like it or not, we're linked and it's the real basis of a fair partnership.
In Igaming.pro, affiliates can ask us 70% two times per year, when you want! Our earning model is not based on wagerings but it's based on ANW, most interesting for affiliates. More, we offer to affiliates the lowerest levels for earn nice revshare :
* 1st level: 25% of the casino’s net profits from 0.000 $ to 5,000 $
* 2nd level: 30% of the casino’s net profits from 5.001 $ to 10,000 $
* 3rd level : 35% of the casino’s net profits above 10,001 $
So, how can you imagine that i could pay by example 70% on deposits never received? Please be serious :-)
I'm simply wondering me if you would accept to pay some bread that the baker made for you but cannot remove from the oven because of the oven door is broken and stayed closed, by example? Baker made the bread especially for you, but do you have to pay this bread considering you cannot eat it? Bread stayed in the oven, baker cannot sell it and you cannot eat it. We are in this situation : players came from your websites but we never received money from processors. Be sure that that this situation is unconfortable for both, not only for you, so we do our best in order to retrieve the money.
Last edited by Igaming.pro; 03-13-2010 at 08:33 PM.
