Today Posts Today Posts
Recent Affiliate Payments
Recent Forum Posts
SHOW: 5 | 8 | 10
  • Affiliate Program
  • Payment Date
  • Payment Method
  • EGamingOnline
    Feb 10th
    Moneybookers
  • Referback
    Feb 10th
    Neteller
  • Star Partner
    Feb 10th
    Moneybookers
  • Deckmedia Affiliates
    Feb 10th
    ECOCard
  • Referback
    Feb 9th
    Moneybookers
Enter Your Recent Payments

View Poll Results: Is Roxy Affiliate's retroactive High Roller Term Acceptable?

Voters
41. You may not vote on this poll
  • Roxy Affiliate's retroactive High Roller Term is acceptable

    5 12.20%
  • Roxy Affiliate's retroactive High Roller Term is not acceptable

    36 87.80%
+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 42
  1. #11
    frazier's Avatar
    frazier is offline Affiliate Program Representative
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Wichita, Kansas USA
    Posts
    2
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 3 Times in 1 Post

    Default Roxy Affiliates...

    Very bad business and relationship issues… Not building for the long term…
    Lloyd F. Frazier
    Managing Director
    Pasha Holdings, L.L.C.
    Chicago, Illinois USA
    pashaholdings@gmail.com - E-Mail
    +1 (801) 749-2655 - Facsimile

  2. #12
    tryme1 is offline Affiliate Guard Dog Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    418
    Thanks
    69
    Thanked 241 Times in 162 Posts

    Default

    I'm always a little reluctant to chime in where things don't directly affect me. Not because I don't care, but more due to the fact it's easy for affiliate programs to dismiss the opinion of people who aren't their affiliates.

    That caveat aside : this is a change that will only negatively effect affiliates. Regardless of the 'retroactive' terms, this kind of term can basically take all of an affiliate's commission for a full month and never replace it.

    Similarly, a $10k win in a month is not and should not designate a high roller. Dropping $30k+ in deposits might be an indication of a serious player, but winning $10k - that has nothing to do with how a player rolls.

    The thing is : the online casinos know this. It's all a cost cutting measure and it's something we need to stop. Frankly, I couldn't give a damn whether Roxy are reputable/nice people/buy their round at the pub/have a younger sister that's really hot/ .

    This isn't acceptable. End of story.

  3. #13
    WCD Admin is offline Affiliate Guard Dog Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    California
    Posts
    831
    Thanks
    566
    Thanked 502 Times in 272 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    I think it is important to have affiliates involved when changing a contract. Simple as that. Maybe even setup a forum on their own site to avoid splinter conversations at multiple forums where someone or another feels left out.

    The program should make a general announcement that there will be a program change and provide a forum for which we can discuss any changes over a specified period of time. The casino should be logical about things - they clearly should not do anything that is clearly underhanded or unfair (like removing commissions owed via regular players to recoup losses on a big winner, as some have mentioned)

    There will be some who will not agree with any changes, and they have that right. There are others who would like to make sure that if a change is to be made, then all parties can participate and hopefully come to an agreement as partners where all sides are taken into consideration.

  4. #14
    ziggy's Avatar
    ziggy is offline Affiliate Guard Dog Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    23
    Thanks
    8
    Thanked 6 Times in 4 Posts

    Default

    I stayed with Roxy since I attempt to promote globally. That being said, I never heard from them about this change regarding High Rollers either before or after.

    My guess? They talked to their most "successful" affiliates.

    No notice here.

    I vote no.

  5. #15
    dominique's Avatar
    dominique is offline Super Moderator
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    1,014
    Thanks
    540
    Thanked 611 Times in 334 Posts

    Default

    I still promote Roxy but never was asked...
    Online Gambling Directory

    Bingo Forum






    Individually, we are one drop. Together, we are an ocean.

  6. #16
    The_CPA is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    7
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 22 Times in 6 Posts

    Default

    J.Todd, IE: The APCW said:
    Roxy has always been one of the most respected affiliate programs around, in my opinion. I don't understand why any affiliate would have an issue with this change. Me:

    To me, it seems like a gift from Roxy to their partners, actually. Me:
    Unbelievable. You are kidding us, right?

    While I have disagreed with you occassionally, I always thought you were a true advocate for the affiliates.

    How in the world could you condone retroactive changes in affiliate terms.
    As a leader in our industry, this is Frightening, IMO.
    I guess you are falling prey to the corporate atmosphere you now live in.

    I guess the Grand Prive thing was OK with you too.
    Same damn difference.
    I can't believe you posted that!!!!!
    I am really disappointed in you!

  7. #17
    greek39 is offline Affiliate Guard Dog Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    243
    Thanks
    186
    Thanked 151 Times in 84 Posts

    Default

    All these programs changing T&C’s into predatory and I have yet to promote any of them. I gave up on Roxy two years ago formally via email. Not a program for me from the start. Suppose a good call on my part considering these brutish changes.

    IMO the high roller term is totally unacceptable. And I really do not like seeing my good friends betrayed in this manner. A community we are and will wait eagerly for the out come.

    greek39

  8. #18
    pdjoe is offline Affiliate Guard Dog Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    130
    Thanks
    19
    Thanked 86 Times in 52 Posts

    Default

    Not acceptable any way you look at it !

    Opt in is the only way this should ever happen, as when Rewards changed.

    Thats why they will always have the best exposure on my sites.


  9. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to pdjoe For This Useful Post:

    bb1webs (07-14-2009),bonustreak (07-13-2009),greek39 (07-13-2009),Renee (07-15-2009)

  10. #19
    greek39 is offline Affiliate Guard Dog Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    243
    Thanks
    186
    Thanked 151 Times in 84 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pdjoe View Post
    Not acceptable any way you look at it !

    Opt in is the only way this should ever happen, as when Rewards changed.

    Thats why they will always have the best exposure on my sites.

    Exactly pdjoe give the aff choices. CR IMO is the best and is the standard. Lets make them richer!

    greek39

  11. The Following User Says Thank You to greek39 For This Useful Post:

    Renee (07-15-2009)

  12. #20
    pdjoe is offline Affiliate Guard Dog Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    130
    Thanks
    19
    Thanked 86 Times in 52 Posts

    Default

    Lol Peter,

    I'll touch on that for a second. If I am lucky enough to get a highroller, I want them at a Casino Rewards casino. Win lose or draw, we make money. They have enough casinos to fill anyones website and always do their best to make it fair for affiliates. Timely payments, OPT in for earning changes....I could go on and one but then I would have to send Renee, "The best affiliate manager in the biz" a bill.....lol.


  13. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to pdjoe For This Useful Post:

    bb1webs (07-14-2009),Daera (07-14-2009),dominique (07-13-2009),Guard Dog (07-14-2009),Renee (07-15-2009)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts