Hi Playshare! Happy October!

[mojo]

Hi Lawrence,

I hope all is well.

Could you advise us of why you have refused to resolve your predatory term that I have been asking you about for seven months now?

Could you post here your final answer? Since I am a betting gal I am going to bet the farm that your bosses dont give a dam and will NEVER answer!!!!!

I hope you do not go to conferences since you refuse to answer the TOUGH questions. I am going to inquire and advise that you do not aquire new affilliates. I am going to request that PLAYSHARE never preys on new affiliates at conferences ever again!!!!

Hey Lawrence! Tell the bosses to stop torturing us!!!

[inspiration]

Lawrence / PSP / Affiliate Guard Dog let us know what the current status/news is please. Your time is up.

[Guard Dog]

That status is that I haven't heard anything from them... I apologize for lack of diligence here, but others can attest that for the past week I have been working 20+ hours per day - leaving time only for sleep.

I will follow up today, which I was planning on doing anyway since it's Friday and I had expected news Monday/Tuesday.

Thank you.

[bonustreak]

You will be happy to hear that a document is going out today with a proposal to AGD, CM, APCW and GPWA. NOTHING will be posted public until these organizations have had a chance to review and respond on the proposed changes. That is progress in the right direction

[TheGamblingGuru]

You will be happy to hear that a document is going out today with a proposal to AGD, CM, APCW and GPWA. NOTHING will be posted public until these organizations have had a chance to review and respond on the proposed changes. That is progress in the right direction

So as far as Playshare is concerned then, 4 people control the thoughts and opinions of earths casino affiliates?

[Guard Dog]

So as far as Playshare is concerned then, 4 people control the thoughts and opinions of earths casino affiliates?

Not at all. It is sent to us only so that we can have our say on the term change (if any) prior to blast-out. We do not always catch everything, but it helps programs from making an even bigger mistake by bouncing it off of us (collectively).

The end result will be what is judged by affiliates and if affiliates do not like what they see, then they can move on from there by either promoting or NOT promoting the properties.

I certainly hope we will find the announcement to be a good one. It has landed in my inbox and I will begin reading now.

[TheGamblingGuru]

Not at all. It is sent to us only so that we can have our say on the term change (if any) prior to blast-out. We do not always catch everything, but it helps programs from making an even bigger mistake by bouncing it off of us (collectively).

The end result will be what is judged by affiliates and if affiliates do not like what they see, then they can move on from there by either promoting or NOT promoting the properties.

I certainly hope we will find the announcement to be a good one. It has landed in my inbox and I will begin reading now.

IMO, I think Mojo should be added to that list as the 5th person, if not for her this issue most likely would have never reached this point in communication anyway. I think it would be only respectful of the program to include Mojo in this. Do you guys not agree with that?

[Guard Dog]

IMO, I think Mojo should be added to that list as the 5th person, if not for her this issue most likely would have never reached this point in communication anyway. I think it would be only respectful of the program to include Mojo in this. Do you guys not agree with that?

That is not my call. If Playshare wishes to do that, it is up to them.

[TheGamblingGuru]

That is not my call. If Playshare wishes to do that, it is up to them.

Yea, I understand it's not your call Andy, but as far as you are concerned, you would be ok with Playshare respectfully including Mojo in the initial review then?

[GamTrak]

IMO, I think Mojo should be added to that list as the 5th person, if not for her this issue most likely would have never reached this point in communication anyway. I think it would be only respectful of the program to include Mojo in this. Do you guys not agree with that?

Good point Rob! I just hope that we don't have to wait very long for the others to 'review' this first, but whatever. Either way let's hope that it's good news!