Today Posts Today Posts
0

NEW POSTS

0

NEW BLOGS

  • Register
  • Help


Enter Your Recent Payments
  • Affiliate Program
  • Payment Date
  • Payment Method
  • iNetBet Affiliate
    May 21st
    Player Account
  • Euro Partners
    May 19th
    Moneybookers
  • Star Partner
    May 18th
    Payspark
  • Gambling Wages
    May 18th
    Neteller
  • Totesport Affiliates
    May 17th
    Player Account
  • Wagershare
    May 16th
    Moneybookers
  • Uffiliates
    May 16th
    Moneybookers
  • WinTingo Affiliates
    May 16th
    Moneybookers
  • C-Planet
    May 14th
    Moneybookers
  • Star Partner
    May 11th
    Moneybookers
Recent Affiliate Payment
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 12 of 12
  1. #11
    Casinofoorumi is offline Affiliate Guard Dog Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    63
    Thanks
    13
    Thanked 16 Times in 7 Posts

    Default

    Imho it really doesn't matter if they now have a max cashout rule or not.
    If they stiffed a player for 32k in December, that's way out of line.
    I honestly can't understand how they can justify an act of pocketing a network wide progressive jackpot paid by Playtech. That's just plain bad.

  2. #12
    GContent is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    7
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default

    Playtech are just as bad for allowing it. The operator should be forced to return the excess money to Playtech to be reintroduced to the pot IMO

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to GContent For This Useful Post:

    Casinofoorumi (04-27-2011)

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •